When you've considered taking a supplement in the past, have visions of the Tooth Fairy ever danced in your head? Even remotely?
I bet that analogy sounds pretty silly to you too, but that's the confusing and maddening approach taken by writer Christie Aschwanden in her feature, 5 Vitamin Truths and Lies, appearing in the latest Reader's Digest. This crash-course in vitamin "research" -- in less than 1,500 words -- argues that the need for average people like you and me to take a supplement is, for the most part, an imaginary and unnecessary one.
Rather than use a thorough approach that shows the pros and cons of taking a supplement as just one of many steps you can take to improve your health, the article shoots holes through a number of ridiculously deceptive and easy targets to prove its faulty points.
For example, "A multivitamin can make up for a bad diet" and "Taking vitamins can protect against cancer" are the shoddy caliber of the low-hanging "myths" this article attempts to "debunk," as if many of you actually believe taking a supplement is the only thing you'll ever need to live a long and healthy life, forgoing exercise, a balanced diet and the right amount of sleep. We're not alone in this assessment either, as that overly-generalized, paint-by-numbers approach, says Douglas MacKay of the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), does far more to confuse the issue than inform.
I suspect the 65 percent of Americans who refer to themselves as users of supplements, according to a CRN survey, make up a large segment of Reader's Digest's target audience. No doubt, they will be shaking their heads in disbelief, as we were, after being told that any effect supplementation has on the collective good health of Americans is mythical.
Separate fact from fiction by spending a few minutes to do some homework of your own, by reviewing CNCA's Nutritional Supplement Quality -- The Facts.
Image source: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Reader's Digest April 2010
NutraIngredients-USA.com March 15, 2010