Citing an "understandably anxious and confused" public, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson recently announced an urgent push for major reforms for the long outmoded 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that governs how the agency regulates toxic chemicals. "Over the years, not only has the TSCA fallen behind the industry it's supposed to regulate, it's been proven an inadequate tool for providing the protection against chemical risks that the public rightfully expects," Jackson says.

It's about time. During TSCA's sorry, 33-year history, the FDA has issued either strong regulations or banned only five chemicals out of some 80,000. Among the reforms being considered:

1. Giving greater authority to the EPA to take action when chemicals don't meet safety standards.

2. Mandating more timely assessments of new and existing priority chemicals.

3. Reviewing chemicals against risk-specific safety standards based on sound science that safeguard the environment and human health.

4. Requiring manufacturers to provide the agency with enough information to make informed assessments about the safety or non-safety of chemicals.

5. Changing the mindset of assessments, so that chemicals aren't automatically assumed to be "innocent until proven guilty," says an Environmental Working Group spokesperson.

A big surprise: The American Chemistry Council endorses the move by the EPA to revamp TSCA, considered by many environmental health experts to be obsolete.

Toxic "surprises" are just another thing to consider when you're weighing the pros and cons of a product to improve your health. Read more about protecting yourself and your family from our toxic world here.

EPA.gov September 29, 2009

San Francisco Chronicle September 30, 2009

USA Today September 29, 2009