The Pros and Cons of Food Irradiation

By CNCA on Nov 12 2009 | 1 Comments

If you've done any research about food safety, especially after some of the worrisome news headlines we've posted in this space, one topic that has probably come up on your Google searches more than once is food irradiation, "a process in which approved foods are exposed to gamma rays, electron beams and x-rays," according to a USDA Fact Sheet.

While irradiation is said to make foods safer by reducing the harmful bacteria and parasites, the USDA claims it's no substitute for good sanitation and safety procedures. And, this interesting post from Grist.org (see link below) puts the discussion in better perspective, detailing the pros and cons of irradiation.

To the good, irradiation may reduce or eliminate harmful organisms hiding in foods like E.coli, salmonella and listeria and leaves no traces of radioactive materials. However, critics claim irradiation is merely a "BandAid" meant to cover up bigger more toxic problems with our food system that may have left a former children's dance teacher paralyzed from the waist down after being exposed to E.coli hiding in a grilled hamburger, according to a frightening New York Times feature.

Make up your own mind about the benefits of irradiated foods by watching these two interesting videos, the first produced by Iowa Public Television and the latter about the first irradiation facility at a public university (Iowa State).





Grist.org October 5, 2009

New York Times October 3, 2009

U.S. News and World Report February 26, 2009

Share |
Categories: General Health , Nutrition

Comments

Mindy C
Mindy C United States on 2/15/2010 9:17 AM     For the life of me, I do not understand why this country has ignored the concurrance of food irradiation and Autism.  In 1985, we began, in ernest, to use the waste products from nuclear energy, to "clean" and "preserve" our food. Not only did the government not have to pay millions to dispose of this waste, now they were being paid for it. The FDA used an admittedly flawed, single study to pass irradiation as safe. (That is verifiabale on line) A simple graph shows the incidence of Autism, Pervasive Developmental Delays, and related neurological deficiencies in children, to spike 90 degrees by the year 1991, 6 years after irradiation's inception.  As we have added more foods, including eggs, to the list of the "treated", the incidence of Autistic children has skyrocketed to 1 in 150, soon to be announced as 1 in 90. Irradiation admittedly alters DNA, chromosomes... Never mind the food is altered and nutritionally corrupt. Science does not deny the damage to DNA and chromosomes.  There is no way to measure or qualify what is happening inside our children.  They just stop talking around 2, and withdraw to a world of isolation. Look at the data, track irradiation and Autism, it will render you speechless. This is no coincidence.
    Vaccinations- heavy metal "preservative", but "no conclusive proof" of Autism link. All mercury removed from vaccinations.  Irradiation "safe"- based on...????? An irradiation plant in NJ had a "spill" of its run-off waste.  Within 2 years, the incidence of Autism in their children neared 50%! THe money our government is saving with its nuclear waste, will be "wasted" a 1000 fold, taking care of these first 2 generations of DNA-altered citizens.
     For the life of me....I don't get it.
Mindy C, mother of Jim, born in 1991, diagnosed with Austism in 1993.

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)
  Country flag


biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading